Skip to content
Nottinghamshire Counts — Nottinghamshire, in numbers.Local help →

Gedling, in numbers

Projects: Gedling

Gedling local authority area. Every figure carries its own date.

The local plans, investments and decisions worth following.

3 selected records checked against official sources. A plan is not a completed project; each record shows the stage its source establishes.

Gedling Village

Gedling Fountain conservation

Specialist repairs and cleaning have conserved the historic fountain without removing fragile stonework.

Restoration completed · evidence dated 2026-07-31

Responsible body: Gedling Borough Council

What the source says: The linked public record supports this project’s location, scope and stated stage; promised benefits are not measured outcomes.

Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?

Progress, funding and source
Cost
Not established by the evidence checked.
Funding
Not established by the evidence checked.
Area covered
Named location verified; a current ward boundary match and the extent of benefits have not been verified. No ward-level outcome is inferred.

No verified ward footprint is assigned.

Gedling Fountain Restored Following Conservation Works | Gedling Borough Council →

Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.

Questions for the next progress report

  • Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
  • Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
  • What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?

Gedling’s historic fountain has been repaired →

Target support where disadvantages overlap →

How to track delivery →

Former Richard Herrod Centre, Carlton

Carlton Active leisure redevelopment

Demolition was scheduled to start in September. The replacement leisure centre still requires design, funding and approval stages.

Demolition programme announced; new centre opening date unconfirmed · source does not state a status date

Responsible body: Gedling Borough Council

What the source says: The linked public record supports this project’s location, scope and stated stage; promised benefits are not measured outcomes.

Next thing to establish: What dated decision or progress report confirms the current stage?

Progress, funding and source
Cost
Not established by the evidence checked.
Funding
Not established by the evidence checked.
Area covered
Named location verified; a current ward boundary match and the extent of benefits have not been verified. No ward-level outcome is inferred.

No verified ward footprint is assigned.

Demolition set to begin at Richard Herrod site as Carlton Active plans progress | Gedling Borough Council →

Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.

Questions for the next progress report

  • What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
  • Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
  • Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
  • What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?

Carlton faces a transition in leisure provision →

Demolition comes before all new-centre decisions →

Target support where disadvantages overlap →

How to track delivery →

Bestwood Village

The Square improvements

A developer contribution has been allocated for play and recreation improvements led by the parish council.

Funding transfer approved · evidence dated 2026-07-23

Responsible body: Gedling Borough Council

What the source says: The linked public record supports this project’s location, scope and stated stage; promised benefits are not measured outcomes.

Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?

Progress, funding and source
Cost
Not established by the evidence checked.
Funding
Not established by the evidence checked.
Area covered
Named location verified; a current ward boundary match and the extent of benefits have not been verified. No ward-level outcome is inferred.

No verified ward footprint is assigned.

£10,000 developer contribution to support improvements at The Square in Bestwood Village | Gedling Borough Council →

Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.

Questions for the next progress report

  • Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
  • Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
  • What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?

Developer funding can improve Bestwood’s local space →

Target support where disadvantages overlap →

How to track delivery →